You are here

Is resistance or resilience a better response to a cyclone?

Top Stories

Anniversary Poster Session and Reception

On the evening of Thursday 7 November 2024 we continued our celebration of the fiftieth anniversary of the founding

Read More ➝

Science Day 2024

On Friday, 18 October 2024 we hosted approximately 700 high school students at

Read More ➝

Smart Glasses + Tesla = Car Thief’s Dream?

The paper "From Virtual Touch to Tesla Command: Unlocking Unauthenticated Control Chains From Smart Glasses for Vehi

Read More ➝

Drs. Kelly Robinson and Beth Stauffer from our Biology Department along with an international team of some 47 other researchers published an interesting new study of the ecological impacts of tropical cyclones, to address a question that people have asked for centuries: When confronted by a storm, is it better to be resistant like an oak or resilient like a willow? You can find the details in the Science Advances paper A general pattern of trade-offs between ecosystem resistance and resilience to tropical cyclones. The findings could help guide managers as they plan for climate change and a growing coastal population threatened by more intense tropical storms. In the study, researchers used pre- and post-storm monitoring surveys to analyze patterns of ecosystem resistance and resilience from 26 Northern Hemisphere storms. These made landfall between 1985 and 2018 in states from Texas to North Carolina, as well as in Puerto Rico and Taiwan. The research is funded by the National Science Foundation.

x

Figure Caption Comparison of resistance and resilience among variable categories within ecosystem types. Columns correspond to ecosystem type, rows correspond to response metric, and colors denote variable category. Violin plots show the distribution of data within each group, while inset box plots show the median, quartiles, and outliers (points). Bars over each plot indicate which variables are not significantly different from one another within ecosystems. Alphanumeric labels under each violin plot indicate which variable categories were significantly different among ecosystems (columns). Letter denotes variable category (e.g., b = biogeochemistry, h = hydrography, m = mobile fauna, s = sedentary fauna, v = vascular plants). Number denotes rank, with different numbers across plots (e.g., b1 versus b2) indicating a significant difference. Red text indicates that for the response variable (row) and the indicated variable category (letter), we observed significant differences among ecosystem types (table S4).

SHARE THIS |